Who+is+to+blame+for+the+failure+of+the+league+of+nations?

The failure of the League of Nations was specifically no ones fault it was doomed to fail. The whole idea of many nations meeting in one place to discuss problems is a very good idea and is now in place with the UN, but the League of Nations took all the countries and used its power to make binding laws. Each country within the league was bound down and forced to abide by its laws, this is the same as all the countries of the world being under rule of one large representative body. The purpose and effect that was to be hopefully achieved by the league was undermined by its obvious initial doom. The UN now achieves that purpose and effect that the league wanted because it has no power, the only power there is, is between the countries. The league tried to prevent the further building of armaments in Europe, this failed because of a domino effect starting with France. They began to build arms along the Rhine armistice line and so in reaction so did Germany and many others to follow. It was this idea of too much power that deterred the American people to joint he league of nations. Although the idea that Woodrow Wilson had was spectacular and did eventually become effective with the UN. Lodge turned peoples heads to the ability the league had to abuse its power and so the American people stepped aside further dooming the league to collapse. The failure of the League of Nations was specifically no ones fault it was doomed to fail. It was doomed to fail because it is impossible to in theory govern the major powers, because that's what the league was in turn doing by using its power to make binding laws that were to be followed by all countries in its realm.